Bates Law Firm https://bateslawfirm.net/ Attorney CPA Legal Services Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:13:50 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://bateslawfirm.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/qrcode_www.canva_.com-1-150x150.png Bates Law Firm https://bateslawfirm.net/ 32 32 Journey from CFO to lawyer https://bateslawfirm.net/journey-from-cfo-to-lawyer/ https://bateslawfirm.net/journey-from-cfo-to-lawyer/#respond Thu, 04 Jun 2026 23:08:00 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=1136 From CFO to lawyer For many years I was a Controller, and then a CFO of various businesses in several industries. At first I did everything from financial reporting and budgeting to HR functions and handling various tax issues. As I got more experience I became involved in multiple M&A transactions and built and helped founding teams build several companies. […]

The post Journey from CFO to lawyer appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

From CFO to lawyer

For many years I was a Controller, and then a CFO of various businesses in several industries. At first I did everything from financial reporting and budgeting to HR functions and handling various tax issues. As I got more experience I became involved in multiple M&A transactions and built and helped founding teams build several companies. I raised $35 million for some and served as a Public Company Board Member for 5 of them in multiple countries. Handling SEC reporting and doing 5 IPO’s and DPO’s was great experience. Audit preparation was needed and I was involved in planning for growth, supervised staff and was involved with other strategic issues.

I became certified in valuations after having to value several acquisitions. I became certified in fraud examinations after uncovering an embezzlement.

Then after seeing some litigation surrounding usurious lending and related issues, I decided I could use my financial experience to become an expert witness.

Around the same time I decided to go to law school, since I already had some legal experience from both my CFO and expert witness work.

Eventually I passed the Bar exam and became a lawyer. The Bar exam was very difficult, and I probably passed because I did over 50,000 multiple choice questions, read/wrote over a thousand essay questions and spent years studying the law. Taking a mock practice exam for extra credit also helped as the Bar was revamping their processes the year I took the exam.

Now I can handle some legal issues such as Demand/cease & desist letters, Securities opinion letters, Negotiations, Contract review, Employment hearings, Discovery preparation, Bankruptcy preparation, Litigation strategy, Dispute resolution etc.

http://www.hpaccounting.com

https://bateslawfirm.net

Bates law firm

The post Journey from CFO to lawyer appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/journey-from-cfo-to-lawyer/feed/ 0
Civil Contempt in Litigation: A Tactical Weapon https://bateslawfirm.net/contempt-robert-bates/ https://bateslawfirm.net/contempt-robert-bates/#respond Wed, 01 Apr 2026 23:32:46 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=1414 Civil Contempt in Commercial Litigation: A Tactical Weapon In high-stakes commercial litigation, disputes over data disclosure often rival the trial itself. When companies face insolvency or accusations of hiding assets, courts depend on strict disclosure orders. If management resists or mishandles those orders, opposing counsel often escalates with one of the judiciary’s strongest tools: a motion for civil contempt. (Contempt […]

The post Civil Contempt in Litigation: A Tactical Weapon appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

Civil Contempt in Commercial Litigation: A Tactical Weapon

In high-stakes commercial litigation, disputes over data disclosure often rival the trial itself. When companies face insolvency or accusations of hiding assets, courts depend on strict disclosure orders. If management resists or mishandles those orders, opposing counsel often escalates with one of the judiciary’s strongest tools: a motion for civil contempt. (Contempt by Bob Bates)

What Civil Contempt Actually Does

Civil contempt isn’t punishment for past conduct — that’s criminal contempt. It’s remedial. The court uses it to force compliance with a specific directive: turn over accounting records, disclose asset locations, preserve funds, etc.

In aggressive corporate battles, legal teams sometimes push for sweeping contempt orders that go beyond key officers and target entire law firms or their staff. These motions are often tactical — designed to disrupt the other side’s momentum — rather than a comment on individual ethics.

Contempt shows up as a weapon or retribution tool in other contexts too.

High-Profile Political Examples

Cabinet officials and politicians are frequent targets when executive and legislative branches clash over documents

    • Merrick Garland, 2024 – House voted for criminal contempt after he withheld audio of President Biden’s interviews with Special Counsel Robert Hur.

    • William Barr, 2019 – House Judiciary voted for contempt when he refused to release the unredacted Mueller Report and underlying evidence.

    • Eric Holder, 2012 – First sitting cabinet member held in contempt. The House penalized him for withholding DOJ documents tied to “Fast and Furious.”

    • Janet Reno, 1998 – Threatened with contempt over confidential campaign-finance memos.

    • James Watt, 1982 – Reagan’s Interior Secretary cited for withholding foreign investment policy documents.

    • Anne Gorsuch Burford, 1982 – EPA head held in contempt 322–43 for refusing to produce Superfund toxic waste records, claiming executive privilege.

    • Bill & Hillary Clinton – Faced bipartisan contempt resolutions for defying subpoenas in the Epstein investigation.

Family Law

Contempt is most common in divorce and family court, especially for unpaid child support. It’s almost always handled as civil contempt to compel payment.

Quasi-Judicial & Administrative Bodies

Agencies, licensing boards, zoning commissions, and environmental tribunals have court-like authority. If a party lies, destroys evidence, or disrupts a regulatory hearing — like an aviation safety audit or utility rate case — the presiding chair can certify that conduct as contempt. A court can then impose fines or order arrests.

The Bottom Line: ‘Contempt by Robert Bates’

In high-stakes corporate litigation, aggressive firms sometimes file contempt motions against opposing counsel and their staff purely as a tactic to disrupt the case. When that happens, it’s typically litigation strategy, not a judgment on the staff’s integrity.

Need an expert witness on contempt, damages, or forensic accounting?
Contact Robert Bates to discuss your case.

Engage Robert Bates
If you’re dealing with a receiver appointment or need to prove or defend contempt involving financial issues, contact HP Accounting for a case evaluation. Bob works directly with litigators in California and nationwide.

Keywords: Robert Bates contempt expert, receiver financial expert, forensic accountant contempt proceeding, court appointed receiver CPA, asset tracing contempt


The post Civil Contempt in Litigation: A Tactical Weapon appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/contempt-robert-bates/feed/ 0
Should we trust AI? https://bateslawfirm.net/ai-blog/ https://bateslawfirm.net/ai-blog/#respond Sat, 11 Oct 2025 19:26:17 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=991 AI Blog: Pros of Trusting AI Cons of Trusting AI For instance, if you ask a language model to summarize a news article and it provides information not present in the article, that’s a hallucination. It’s a situation where the AI thinks something would please the user and it ‘fills in the gaps’. However, it is almost wrong when it […]

The post Should we trust AI? appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

AI Blog: Pros of Trusting AI

  1. Efficiency: AI can process vast amounts of data quickly, making it useful for tasks like data analysis and automation.
  2. Pattern recognition: AI can identify patterns in data that humans might miss, leading to insights and discoveries.
  3. Consistency: AI systems can perform tasks consistently, reducing the risk of human error.

Cons of Trusting AI

  1. Bias: AI systems can perpetuate biases present in the data used to train them, leading to unfair outcomes.
  2. Lack of transparency: Some AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it hard to understand their decision-making processes.
  3. Dependence on data quality: AI systems are only as good as the data they’re trained on, and poor data quality can lead to poor performance.
  4. AI can hallucinate: AI In AI, particularly in large language models, “hallucination” refers to when a model generates information or outputs that aren’t based on any actual input data or facts. This can result in false, nonsensical, or unrelated content. Hallucinations can occur due to various reasons such as:

For instance, if you ask a language model to summarize a news article and it provides information not present in the article, that’s a hallucination. It’s a situation where the AI thinks something would please the user and it ‘fills in the gaps’. However, it is almost wrong when it does this.

Personal scenarios I have seen major issues

1) A medical AI program invented body parts and non-existent medications-obviously a huge problem for patients/doctors

2) CPA AI-where there are similar numbers AI cannot differentiate between 2 different items         

3) Broker input for expert work-AI did not approach the problem correctly-it botched the analysis of paystubs, using the wrong assumptions and doing calculations on the wrong numbers

4) Legal-I have a client who was warned he would be heavily sanctioned if he used AI again, since it made up fake cases in his filings. Many lawyers have been fined tens of thousands of dollars and risk malpractice and worse. Some AI is wrong more than 90% of the time in legal contexts (see article below)

When to Trust AI

  1. Well-defined tasks: AI can be trusted for well-defined tasks with clear objectives and high-quality data.
  2. Human oversight: AI systems should be designed with human oversight and review processes and outputs

www.hpaccounting.com

 
AI Blog

The post Should we trust AI? appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/ai-blog/feed/ 0
Cease and desist letters https://bateslawfirm.net/cease-and-desist-letters/ https://bateslawfirm.net/cease-and-desist-letters/#respond Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:01:21 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=955   Understanding Cease and Desist Letters A cease and desist letter is a formal document that demands an individual or organization stop engaging in a specific activity or behavior. This letter is often used to address intellectual property infringement, defamation, harassment, or other unlawful actions. In this blog, we’ll delve into the world of cease and desist letters, exploring their […]

The post Cease and desist letters appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

 

Understanding Cease and Desist Letters

A cease and desist letter is a formal document that demands an individual or organization stop engaging in a specific activity or behavior. This letter is often used to address intellectual property infringement, defamation, harassment, or other unlawful actions. In this blog, we’ll delve into the world of cease and desist letters, exploring their purpose, components, and the steps to take when receiving or sending one.

What is a Cease and Desist Letter?

A cease and desist letter is a written notice that orders an individual or organization to immediately stop engaging in a specific activity or behavior. This letter is usually sent by a lawyer or a representative of the affected party and is intended to:

  • Stop the infringing activity or behavior
  • Prevent further damage or harm
  • Provide an opportunity for the recipient to comply with the demands
  • Common uses:
  • Intellectual property disputes (copyrighttrademarkpatent). 
  • Harassment. 
  • Libel and slander
  • Breaches of contract. 

Components of a Cease and Desist Letter

A typical cease and desist letter includes:

  1. Introduction: A clear statement of the sender’s identity and their authority to send the letter.
  2. Description of the infringing activity: A detailed explanation of the specific activity or behavior that is causing harm or infringement.
  3. Demand for cessation: A direct demand that the recipient immediately stop engaging in the infringing activity.
  4. Consequences of non-compliance: A clear statement of the consequences of failing to comply with the demands, such as litigation or further action.
  5. Opportunity to respond: An invitation for the recipient to respond to the letter, either to acknowledge compliance or to dispute the claims.

What to Do When Receiving a Cease and Desist Letter

If you receive a cease and desist letter, follow these steps:

  1. Take the letter seriously: Recognize that the letter is a formal demand and not a trivial matter.
  2. Seek professional advice: Consult with a lawyer or a qualified professional to understand your rights and obligations.
  3. Respond promptly: Reply to the letter within the specified timeframe, acknowledging receipt and indicating your intentions.
  4. Comply with the demands: If the demands are reasonable and valid, take immediate action to stop the infringing activity.
  5. Dispute the claims (if necessary): If you believe the claims are unfounded or exaggerated, respond with a clear and concise explanation of your position.

What to Do When Sending a Cease and Desist Letter

If you need to send a cease and desist letter, follow these steps:

  1. Gather evidence: Collect relevant documentation and evidence to support your claims.
  2. Consult with a lawyer: Seek professional advice to ensure your letter is legally sound and effective.
  3. Clearly state your demands: Use specific language to describe the infringing activity and the desired outcome.
  4. Provide an opportunity for response: Allow the recipient a reasonable timeframe to respond and comply with the demands.
  5. Be prepared for further action: If the recipient fails to comply, be prepared to take further action, such as litigation.

Conclusion

Cease and desist letters are a serious matter that requires prompt attention and action. Whether you’re receiving or sending a cease and desist/demand letter, it’s essential to understand the components, implications, and next steps. By taking a proactive and informed approach, you can effectively address the issues at hand and protect your rights and interests.

CONTACT US TO SEND A CEASE AND DESIST LETTER: https://bateslawfirm.net/contact-us/

www.bateslawfirm.net

The post Cease and desist letters appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/cease-and-desist-letters/feed/ 0
Where’s the evidence? https://bateslawfirm.net/wheres-the-evidence/ https://bateslawfirm.net/wheres-the-evidence/#respond Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:19:31 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=940   I have handled several cases in which the evidence seems lacking, especially at first. Sometimes all that is needed is for the attorney or client or other professional to write a narrative. This can get linked to evidence ‘dumps’, as having tens of thousands of pages of bank statements can be next to worthless otherwise. Evidence is the backbone […]

The post Where’s the evidence? appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

 

I have handled several cases in which the evidence seems lacking, especially at first. Sometimes all that is needed is for the attorney or client or other professional to write a narrative. This can get linked to evidence ‘dumps’, as having tens of thousands of pages of bank statements can be next to worthless otherwise.

Evidence is the backbone of court cases. It’s what helps prove or disprove facts in a legal dispute. In court, evidence is used to support or challenge claims made by either the plaintiff or the defense.

Evidence can be physical things like documents, objects, or digital data, or it can be testimony from witnesses. The main point of evidence is to help the judge or jury figure out what really happened.

For example, if someone’s accused of theft, evidence like security footage, witness statements, or physical evidence found at the scene can be important in determining guilt or innocence.

In a civil case, evidence shows negligence or contract breach, among other things. For example, it can show that contract terms were not complied with. Or in a tort case it can show a party was defrauded. In a personal injury case it shows damages were sustained.

My cases

One case I handled has almost no usable evidence so far, after many months. The case originated in the plaintiff’s mind, and I’m still not sure whether anything nefarious has occurred. The plaintiff has no lawyer and has other similar cases-overall not a good sign for them.

Another case I have was reported to the police as a fraud scheme. Apparently the officer had experience as a former contractor and understood it enough to document it. However I don’t believe anything further happened on the criminal end. I asked the client to thoroughly document/graph out how the fraud occurred as it was a new case to me. They said it might be more clear after the police close their investigation. So far I have not received anything useful.

Yet another new case has tons of information in the form of bank statements etc. but there is no clarity in how the fraud was perpetrated. I told the plaintiff that-at a minimum-they would need to provide a narrative. Then someone needs to connect the assertions with the evidence.

Finally, one is a case of a spouse having taken funds prior to death. Now the widow is left trying to explain to a court or me, as a forensic expert, how to prove an elaborate scheme. However, they are having difficulty getting all of the bank statements/evidence. The case cannot move forward without proof/evidence that is organized/presented in a logical format, without too many holes.

Courts need frauds and complex matters to be thoroughly explained to them. Without all of the dots being connected these type of cases will never move forward.

www.hpaccounting.com

The post Where’s the evidence? appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/wheres-the-evidence/feed/ 0
Information- the right amount/type for experts https://bateslawfirm.net/expert-witness-disclosure-lawyer/ https://bateslawfirm.net/expert-witness-disclosure-lawyer/#respond Thu, 24 Jul 2025 23:37:45 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=913 When one starts an expert engagement the attorneys typically send a case file to the expert. Usually the file contains some pleadings, various discovery and other items. Hopefully the complaint, a reply (though these are sometimes very bare-bones) and a case status report are present. Later, a trial brief or similar document is helpful for an expert to understand the […]

The post Information- the right amount/type for experts appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

When one starts an expert engagement the attorneys typically send a case file to the expert. Usually the file contains some pleadings, various discovery and other items. Hopefully the complaint, a reply (though these are sometimes very bare-bones) and a case status report are present. Later, a trial brief or similar document is helpful for an expert to understand the case.

When it is a financial expert the discovery may include financial statements, tax returns and even bank statements.

Sometimes there can be other items such as prior valuations, opposing expert reports or even correspondence to give context to financial/legal transactions.

Discovery disputes/missing documents

Sometimes parties try to hide information in an effort to stymie the opposition. Almost always the documents requested are necessary for the expert/litigation and are not privileged. Privilege is more for attorney work product and attorney/client communication. Documents prepared prior to litigation in the ordinary course of business are not privileged and must be disclosed.

Hidden tax returns

I have seen multiple cases where tax returns have been withheld. There is ample case law such as PALOMBA WEINGARTEN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; POINTE SAN DIEGO RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY which requires returns be disclosed. This is because the information is more reliable in a tax return, and isn’t available elsewhere. A redaction of ssn’s and dob’s etc is required prior to disclosing.

Also in Schnabel V Superior court ‘The trial court acted within its discretion in compelling Orange Container to produce its business records and its corporate tax returns and quarterly payroll tax returns’.

Also,  inspection rights of a shareholder apply. Corporations Code section 1601, subdivision (a), provides in pertinent part: “The accounting books and records … shall be open to inspection upon the written demand on the corporation of any shareholder … at any reasonable time during usual business hours, for a purpose reasonably related to such holder’s interests as a shareholder ….”

Finally, privilege is not available in some cases because of an overriding public policy in favor of disclosure-the information isn’t available elsewhere.

Too much information vs not enough

In some cases I received up to or more than 100,000 pages of documents. This obviously takes an exorbitant amount of time to go through. Sometimes a chart/table of contents can be helpful, or the use of an assistant to organize the documents is appropriate. However, when receiving oodles of bank statements or similar, not being familiar with certain coding or the context/importance can make these items useless.

One scenario where this level of detail is important is in a forensic case where tracing/summarizing is needed. Those cases are very labor intensive and still require a top-level view to understand the meaning of all the little pieces of information.

It is always important to strike a balance between not enough and too much, and receiving the correct information. Without enough information it can be difficult to reach a conclusion.

www.hpaccounting.com

https://hpaccounting.com/cfo-cpa-cva-cfe-jd-valuation

HP Accounting expert witness

www.Bateslawfirm.net

The post Information- the right amount/type for experts appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/expert-witness-disclosure-lawyer/feed/ 0
Why I chose to go to law school https://bateslawfirm.net/why-i-chose-to-go-to-law-school/ https://bateslawfirm.net/why-i-chose-to-go-to-law-school/#respond Wed, 11 Jun 2025 07:34:41 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=518 So why did I chose to go to law school in recent years? Some was personal-concern over my career, and the state of affairs in the US and the world. And some was business-I thought I had already learned a lot about the law as a result of being an expert witness and going through the litigation process multiple times. This would […]

The post Why I chose to go to law school appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

So why did I chose to go to law school in recent years? Some was personal-concern over my career, and the state of affairs in the US and the world. And some was business-I thought I had already learned a lot about the law as a result of being an expert witness and going through the litigation process multiple times. This would potentially give me a head-start in furthering my education. I didn’t want an MBA so this was a good alternative.

I took a sample law school multiple choice test and did ok without having any formal legal training, other than a business law class years ago. After my mother died and I had a son I decided to take the plunge as the next chapter in my busy life. I underestimated some of the workload but eventually made it to the homestretch, and then took the Bar exam.

There have been several skills that I have honed-reading/writing, analytical thinking, looking at both sides of disputes, how to issue spot etc. I believe it will help my credibility as an expert to also be a JD/Attorney.

Do I need to know rule against perpetuities or reciprocal negative easement? Probably not after the Bar exam. But I did get the highest score in Contracts and in Property-so I must have understood something!

What have I learned? First I took contracts/torts and criminal law and assorted introductory research/law classes. I learned the components of contracts, remedies for broken agreements and the like. I learned about things like oral contracts and damages. We learned about negligence and intentional torts, about crimes against the person and property.

I learned Wills & Trusts for the first time, and what ethical considerations/disclosures/conflict of interests and various relationships that occur in Professional Responsibility. Likewise I passed the MPRE and Moral Character determination. In Community Property we discussed marital assets and in Business I expanded my knowledge of proxies, agency and the like. 

In Civil Procedure I learned how lawsuits are supposed to proceed, with jurisdiction, discovery, pleadings etc. And in Constitutional law we learned state vs federal and the branches and individual rights. Finally, in Evidence topics such as relevance, hearsay and objections were covered.

I look forward to how all of this knowledge will help me in analyzing cases in the future.

Legal Blog Law

The post Why I chose to go to law school appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/why-i-chose-to-go-to-law-school/feed/ 0
Officer Vs Director: What’s the difference?-law blog https://bateslawfirm.net/officer-vs-director-everything-you-need-to-know-law-blog/ https://bateslawfirm.net/officer-vs-director-everything-you-need-to-know-law-blog/#comments Wed, 11 Jun 2025 07:27:11 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=512 Law blog: Depending on the company, the officers and directors can comprise the same people who serve in both capacities. However, there is often confusion about the differences between officers and directors and the responsibilities they each perform. It is because they often work closely together. But they have different duties in a corporation.A director is a person responsible for […]

The post Officer Vs Director: What’s the difference?-law blog appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

Law blog:

Depending on the company, the officers and directors can comprise the same people who serve in both capacities. However, there is often confusion about the differences between officers and directors and the responsibilities they each perform. It is because they often work closely together. But they have different duties in a corporation.
A director is a person responsible for managing the business affairs of a corporation and comprise the Board of Directors while officers are actively involved in the daily operations of the company. (law blog)

The Directors

To qualify for the post of the director of a company, you must be at least eighteen years of age and agree to take on the responsibilities of a director. The directors make the operational decisions of the company and ensure that the company meets its statutory obligations.
They are usually elected by shareholders or owners of the company during annual meetings to serve on the board of directors. It is to enable the smooth decision-making process of the board and to ensure that they fulfill the company’s obligations. While there are allocations for the duties of the directors in the articles of incorporation and the corporate bylaws, the primary responsibility of directors is to operate on behalf of the shareholders.

On the appointment of the board, they perform special duties such as:
1. Making crucial management decisions
2. Staying informed about corporation performance, especially on insolvency
3. Set up mission, policies, and objectives that will help govern the organization
4. Ensure compliance with the laws that apply to the company’s operations.

Other general duties of the board include:


1. Acting on behalf of the corporation
2. Selecting and appointing new officers
3. Conducting regular meetings
4. Approve annual budgets, agreements, and contracts.
5. Amend particular statutes or parts of the articles of incorporation to suit the company.

Defining Board of Directors: Who Is on the Board?


The number of boards of directors can range in size but its minimum is sometimes determined at the state or charter level. To determine the number of board of directors, the statutes of the company holds that all companies, even smaller companies, must have at least one director who can act as the company owner and the only officer.
Meanwhile, larger companies may have multiple directors ranging from three to ten people or more, who have been appointed and elected by the shareholders to manage the business of the company operating on the board.

Corporate Officers


In contrast to appointing and electing directors by the shareholders, the board of directors is responsible for appointing officers. The officers act on behalf of the board of directors by executing the decisions made by the board. The job of a corporate officer is to oversee the day-to-day activities of the corporation.
Officer duties differ according to the position because they reside over departments where they have the most experience, with the principal responsibility being the organization of the corporation. If stated otherwise in the bylaws, a single person can also hold over one position. For instance, the president can also assume the office of the Chief Executive Officer or CEO.

Depending on the corporation, the statutes may mandate that officers already serve on the board. It does not necessarily make the director and officer the same because the directors can be entirely different from officers. However, officers do not vote on the board but can only vote according to their station.
The bylaws and documents of the corporation show the responsibilities of all officers. The bylaws usually provide for several corporate officers. The most common are:

Titles
  1. President
    The president is often known as the CEO. He holds the most responsibility within a company and is responsible for making decisions on corporate policy and operations. He also signs major contracts, issues stock, approves business arrangements, stock offerings, and other legal documents.
  2. Vice President
    The vice president assumes the role of the president in his or her absence. However, companies don’t need to have separate vice presidents.
  3. Treasurer
    The treasurer is sometimes the Chief Financial Officer and is in charge of the finances of the corporation. The CFO calculates financial risks, tracks cash flow, plans financial strategies, oversees the company audits, and handles financial records.
  4. Secretary
    The secretary makes and keeps the corporation’s books, records, documents, and minutes from shareholder meetings. The secretary is also responsible for keeping the corporate seal if the company has one. Unlike other positions that can be occupied by the same person, the office of the secretary cannot.
    Sometimes the President fulfils the other officer roles.

Conclusion

 

While directors and officers work together to manage the company, their responsibilities vary. Officers are not liable for any lawful action taken on behalf of the corporation but, directors are. Some companies, especially public ones, can get D&O insurance to insulate Directors and Officers from some litigation, assuming they have acted in good faith.

There are many other ‘CXO’ positions such as CTO, CIO, Chief People officer, Chief Marketing officer, Chief Communications officer and dozens of other ones.

The key to look at in terms of liability is does the person control assets, significant transactions, information to external parties, stock etc. If they don’t control these things or are privy to material ‘inside’ information they are probably not a control person, and thus not a true legal officer.

www.hpaccounting.com https://bateslawfirm.net/services/

https://bateslawfirm.net/  law blog/law blog

The post Officer Vs Director: What’s the difference?-law blog appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/officer-vs-director-everything-you-need-to-know-law-blog/feed/ 1
No more depositions? https://bateslawfirm.net/no-more-depositions-law-blog-legal/ https://bateslawfirm.net/no-more-depositions-law-blog-legal/#respond Wed, 11 Jun 2025 07:13:02 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=503 Lately I’ve had 3 cases move forward to trial without a deposition of my expert opinions/reports. This is an interesting trend so I thought I’d examine it further. Typically I do work on a case, write a report, with either a damage calculation or valuation, if appropriate. Then I’m deposed to discuss the report. The deposition is a chance for […]

The post No more depositions? appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

Lately I’ve had 3 cases move forward to trial without a deposition of my expert opinions/reports. This is an interesting trend so I thought I’d examine it further.

Typically I do work on a case, write a report, with either a damage calculation or valuation, if appropriate. Then I’m deposed to discuss the report. The deposition is a chance for both sides to get more focused on what the issues are, and sometimes to get closer to settlement. Sometimes there are minor changes as a result of points brought up by opposition, and we move forward to trial. The trial is somewhat a repeat of the deposition, but typically focused on certain areas.

In California, there is law about an expert demand or exchange 50 days before trial. Also there are sometimes relevant local rules in conjunction with trial/settlement conferences as another deadline for disclosing an expert.

Case example

The following is taken from a recent case in which opposition chose/forgot to depose me, and suddenly remembered on the eve of trial they were supposed to. They tried to ask the court for forgiveness for their mistake. These outline the rules/precedent surrounding experts:

Plaintiff fully complied with the expert disclosure requirements in Code of Civil Procedure §§ 2034.260 and 2034.270, including the requirement that “[i]f a demand for an exchange of information concerning expert trial witnesses includes a demand for production of reports and writings as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2034.210. All parties shall produce and exchange, at the place and on the date specified in the demand, all discoverable reports and writings, if any, made by any designated expert described in subdivision (b) of Section 2034.210.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 2034.270.) 

Contrary to the Motion in Limine, there “was not a violation of section 2034.270 since the reports and writings were not in existence on that date.” (See Boston v. Penny Lane Centers, Inc. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 936, 949.) “Neither this provision nor any other requires that expert witnesses refrain from creating new or additional reports or writings after the specified date.” (Id. at 951.) Indeed, “the Legislature appears to have anticipated that experts would continue their preparations after the specified date.” (Id. at 952.)

Notably, Defendants elected not to take the deposition of Bates to determine the basis for his opinion.  Under the circumstances, there is no basis to exclude Bates’ expert witness opinions, reports or writings.  (See Boston, supra, 170 Cal.App.4th 954 [trial court property denied motion defendant’s motion to exclude plaintiff’s expert witnesses’ opinions where defendants made a “strategic choice not to depose [plaintiff’s] expert witnesses …”].)

Conclusion

It makes for an interesting situation. Of course many attorneys have tried to exclude experts but it is difficult if the expert has sound opinions to share and has the relevant qualifications/training/experience etc. Also the expert should meet the various state/federal requirements such as that of the Daubert standard. Perhaps this string is just a coincidence and depositions will return next year !

Law Blog Legal

www.bateslawfirm.net

The post No more depositions? appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/no-more-depositions-law-blog-legal/feed/ 0
May 5, 2025: Announcement https://bateslawfirm.net/may-5-2025-announcement-law-legal-blog/ https://bateslawfirm.net/may-5-2025-announcement-law-legal-blog/#respond Wed, 11 Jun 2025 07:04:40 +0000 https://bateslawfirm.net/?p=497 Bates Law Firm is pleased to announce that Robert Bates has passed the California Bar exam and as of May 12 is now a licensed Attorney. Mr. Bates will continue to provide financial expert witness services. He will also work part-time in the legal area on areas of lower complexity. (www.hpaccounting.com) He is now a licensed attorney, ready to provide […]

The post May 5, 2025: Announcement appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>

Bates Law Firm is pleased to announce that Robert Bates has passed the California Bar exam and as of May 12 is now a licensed Attorney.

Mr. Bates will continue to provide financial expert witness services. He will also work part-time in the legal area on areas of lower complexity. (www.hpaccounting.com)

He is now a licensed attorney, ready to provide expert legal services to clients.

Law school legal blog

www.bateslawfirm.net

The post May 5, 2025: Announcement appeared first on Bates Law Firm.

]]>
https://bateslawfirm.net/may-5-2025-announcement-law-legal-blog/feed/ 0